I guess you might have heard of the news about the anti-piracy technology being in-build in Windows Vista, but the issue there is, is it really hardened enough to block crackers out there? Another question: Is Microsoft happy that there’s a ‘larger market share’ provided that some percent of it use unlicensed ones? In the article, a reader commented that a Windows system will never be as productive as a nicely configured Linux/BSD system because there’s no “out of the box” on the latter. Well, I don’t think I have to defend the “out of the box” thing for I’m proud that I had switched (or at least dualbooted) some people to Linux (usually Ubuntu) and they were really satisfied. I had even assisted one to compile and install Gaim 2.0beta via chatting on Gaim on Ubuntu recently!
For the record, is Bill Gates a technical wizard? You might wanna read the article, Hasta la Vista: Microsoft’s final death march:
Unfortunately, Bill Gates is not a wizard. Even worse, he is a bad programmer. When Martin Eller, a Microsoft programmer, found an error in the flood fill routine of the MS-Basic interpreter, he exclaimed “Which moron wrote this brainless sh*t?” only to find out it was Gates himself who wrote the “brainless sh*t”. I think it is safe to say that Bill Gates is hardly the technical wizard he would so much like to be.
Some weeks from now, Vista and Office 2007 will be launched on November 30 as publicized through digg. There will be five versions of Windows Vista that will be somewhat problematic when it comes to consumers. I guess this will be more confusing to people as compared to their previous release of WinXP Home and Pro editions (that might be even better than Vista’s features) in which the differences were somewhat more established.
I used to work before in a technical helpdesk that offers open source and the experience I had there was that people want to have Linux (on their CD/DVD) but they don’t have any idea on the different distributions of Linux. Usually, the suggestion to the consumer will depend on the agent that was assigned at a particular schedule but actually it’s only either Ubuntu or SuSe. That was actually simpler – no need for numerous editions of an OS, for in my opinion the consumer should have the freedom to choose what he/she wants. Nowadays, Linux installations are more customizable for it allows choices to installing packages (server, development, etc) and even disabling them without necessarily making the system handicapped.
Is there a Synaptic/Yum/Yast counterpart on Windows? I don’t think so. It’s just somewhat funny how some people were so afraid to test softwares due to virus threats because Windows users don’t have any choice but to install third party applications – even worse if the application is not authenticated or trusted by Microsoft Windows. In my Ubuntu box, I usually test a new software every week and I’m not afraid of viruses and its forms for I believe that the open source developers out there are active all the time in patching security flaws. They’re active as far as turn-around time processing is concerned. So if in case I get to encounter a bug or some critical flaw, most likely someone had already experienced the same thing and had the fixed for the problem as well!
On the other side of the fence, take the recent YM trojan as an example. It clearly shows that there’s no point of getting anti-virus applications installed on your Windows system. I really don’t know (fyi, i’m windows-free) but the fix for that instance involves tweaking some Windows system configuration file if not an antivirus software solution. Actually, I tried clicking those links and as expected, nothing happened. I just suggested Gaim as an alternative. But wait, I thought Windows was user-friendly? Is the Help thing really helpful? How about a manual? Those Vista developers should really watch the Spotlight feature on the Mac OS X State of the Union presentation. Besides, they should consider it assuming that Mac OS X imitation is included on their goals. Haha. When I was watching that Spotlight demo – it was like a jaw-dropping wow! That’s what you call software usability! Well, I hope that Linux can do the same thing via Beagle.
Since we’re talking about Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X, let me show you one of my experiences:

The photo above shows people looking over Mac OS X (with Parallels software running WinXP, Ubuntu, and Solaris 10 as virtual machines) and Kubuntu Linux while Vista RC1 was the OS featured on the right. I was supposed to test Vista on Parallels too but actually the support was only released a week after my presentation. Looking over the image, do the people look interested on Microsoft Windows Vista? What do you think?
For me, it is not the end of Vista’s beginning that’s near, but rather the beginning of Vista’s end is near.